COMMITTED TO JUSTICE
in Detroit and Beyond
SSDI for Diabetes and Endocrine Disorders in Michigan
What You Need to Know About Diabetes and SSDI in Michigan
The endocrine body system at 9.00 of the Social Security Administration’s Listing of Impairments contains no listings, and the regulation instead directs that impairments resulting from endocrine disorders be evaluated under the listings for other body systems.
- No endocrine listing exists: There is no numbered listing for diabetes, and no blood glucose or A1C figure that qualifies a claimant.
- Where nerve damage goes: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is evaluated under Listing 11.14 in the neurological body system.
- Where circulation problems go: Peripheral arterial disease falls under Listing 4.12, and amputation resulting from it falls under Listing 1.20.
- Where the other complications go: Retinopathy to the 2.00 listings, kidney failure to 6.00, and cognitive or mood effects to 12.00.
- Why combined effects decide these claims: The agency must weigh every medically determinable impairment together, including those it does not find severe.
- The earnings limit that applies first: Monthly earnings above $1,690 in 2026 ordinarily count as substantial gainful activity and end the inquiry at step one.
Diabetic complication claims come to Neumann Law Group from Midland County and every other part of the state.
A well-controlled diagnosis and a disabling one look nearly identical on a lab report, which is why we tell Michigan clients at Neumann Law Group that their Social Security Disability claim will not be decided by their A1C. Diabetes reaches the agency as a collection of consequences spread across several body systems, and a file organized around the diagnosis rather than the damage tends to read as thinner than the claimant’s actual condition.
Why Is There No Listing for Diabetes?
The endocrine body system is structured differently from every other. Where the musculoskeletal, cardiac, respiratory, and mental body systems each open with a category of impairments and a set of numbered listings, 9.00 opens with a description of hormonal imbalance and then routes the reader elsewhere. The regulation states that the agency evaluates impairments resulting from endocrine disorders under the listings for other body systems, and it works through examples: pituitary disorders producing diabetes insipidus are evaluated for recurrent dehydration under 6.00, thyroid disorders producing arrhythmia under 4.00 and producing weight loss under 5.00, hypertensive stroke under 11.00, and parathyroid-related osteoporosis and fracture under 1.00. There is no 9.01 category and no numbered endocrine listing to meet, so a claim that argues the diagnosis is severe has no provision to argue it under.
Where Do Diabetic Complications Actually Get Evaluated?
Each complication is assessed under the body system it damages, and the criteria differ sharply between them.
| Complication | Listing | What the criteria turn on |
|---|---|---|
| Peripheral neuropathy | 11.14 | Disorganization of motor function in two extremities producing extreme limitation, or marked limitation in physical functioning plus one area of mental functioning |
| Peripheral arterial disease | 4.12 | Resting ankle-brachial systolic pressure ratio below 0.50, with toe pressures substituted where calcification distorts the reading |
| Amputation | 1.20 | Level of amputation and the resulting loss of upper or lower extremity function |
| Retinopathy and vision loss | 2.00 | Measured visual acuity and visual field testing |
| Kidney disease | 6.00 | Dialysis, transplant, or laboratory findings of renal failure |
| Depression and cognitive change | 12.00 | The four areas of mental functioning under paragraph B |
The practical consequence is that a single diabetes claim can require evidence assembled from an endocrinologist, a podiatrist, an ophthalmologist, a nephrologist, and a mental health provider, none of whom is documenting the others’ findings.
How Do Combined Effects Win a Diabetes Claim?
Most diabetes claims do not meet any listing, and the decision moves to residual functional capacity at steps four and five. That is favorable ground when the record is built for it. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 requires the agency to consider all medically determinable impairments when it assesses capacity, expressly including impairments that were not found severe, and to base the assessment on all relevant evidence in the record. Diabetes is the condition that provision was written for. Neuropathic foot pain that limits standing, retinopathy that limits close work, fatigue that limits sustained pace, and the need for frequent urination and glucose monitoring may each be individually unremarkable in a chart while together eliminating the capacity to work a full schedule on a sustained basis.
Claims denied on a well-managed A1C frequently have an unbuilt neuropathy or vision record sitting behind them, and the attorneys at the firm will identify which complication the file has failed to document, at no cost.
What Evidence Proves a Diabetic Complication Claim?
Endocrinology records establish the disease, its duration, and the treatment history, and they matter most where they show a condition that has not responded to escalating management rather than one recently diagnosed. Beyond that, the useful evidence is specific to each complication and is usually held by a different provider. Electrodiagnostic testing and a documented sensory examination establish neuropathy in the terms Listing 11.14 uses, and a monofilament examination recording absent protective sensation carries more weight than a note describing numbness. Ankle-brachial index testing documents arterial disease, and where diabetes has calcified the vessels the toe-brachial ratio is the measurement that reflects reality.
Ophthalmology records with measured acuity and formal visual field testing are needed for a retinopathy component, since a statement that vision is blurry establishes nothing the 2.00 listings can use. Wound care and podiatry records document ulceration, healing time, and any hospitalization for infection, and they are among the most persuasive records in a diabetes file because they show a body that no longer repairs itself on a normal timeline. Laboratory panels showing renal function support a kidney component. Above all, a treating provider’s functional assessment stating how long the claimant can stand and walk, how often they must elevate the feet, and how many unscheduled breaks glucose management requires converts a multi-system diagnosis into the vocational terms the agency decides on.
How Neumann Law Group Builds a Michigan Diabetes Claim
Our attorneys start by inventorying which body systems the disease has actually reached, because that inventory determines which five or six sets of records the file needs and which are irrelevant. We request records from every treating provider rather than from the endocrinologist alone, since the complication evidence generally lives with the podiatrist, the ophthalmologist, and the nephrologist. Where a claim was denied on good glycemic control, we treat that as a signal the file was read as a diagnosis file and rebuild it around function. We also ask treating providers to address unscheduled breaks and foot elevation directly, because those are the restrictions that a vocational expert must account for and the ones least likely to appear in a chart on their own.
What to Do Now With a Michigan Diabetes Disability Claim
List every complication separately on the application rather than writing diabetes alone, because the agency evaluates each under a different body system and cannot weigh what was not claimed. Ask your primary care provider or endocrinologist which physicians have treated your complications, and request records from each of them directly. Ask whether electrodiagnostic testing has ever been done for numbness, since many claimants do not know whether it was performed. Request the full ophthalmology report including visual field results rather than the summary line. Keep a record of foot ulcers, their healing time, and any antibiotic courses or hospital stays. Track how often glucose management interrupts an ordinary day, including testing, treating a low, and the recovery time afterward, because that frequency rarely reaches a medical chart.
Frequently Asked Questions About Diabetes SSDI Claims in Michigan
Is There a Disability Listing for Diabetes?
No. The endocrine body system at 9.00 contains no listings at all, which is unusual and is the single most important fact about these claims. The regulation directs that impairments resulting from endocrine disorders are evaluated under the listings for other body systems, so a diabetes claim is built on what the disease has damaged rather than on the diagnosis itself.
Which Listings Do Diabetic Complications Fall Under?
Peripheral neuropathy is evaluated under Listing 11.14, peripheral arterial disease under Listing 4.12, amputation under Listing 1.20, diabetic retinopathy under the 2.00 special senses listings, kidney failure under the 6.00 genitourinary listings, and cognitive or mood effects under the 12.00 mental disorders listings. A single claimant may have evidence spread across four or five body systems at once.
Can You Get SSDI for Diabetes if Each Complication Is Mild?
Often yes, and this is where these claims are won. Under 20 C.F.R. 404.1545, the agency must consider all medically determinable impairments when it assesses residual functional capacity, including impairments it did not find severe. Neuropathy, fatigue, vision change, and frequent urination may each look minor in isolation while together removing the ability to sustain full-time work.
Does an A1C Level Decide a Diabetes Disability Claim?
No. No listing sets a qualifying blood glucose or A1C threshold, because the endocrine body system has no listings. Laboratory values document that the disease exists and how well it is controlled, but the agency decides the claim on functional consequences, which means the neuropathy findings, the vision testing, the wound records, and the documented limits on standing and walking carry more weight.
How Does Diabetes Affect Testing for Peripheral Arterial Disease?
It can distort it. Listing 4.12A is met at a resting ankle-brachial systolic blood pressure ratio below 0.50, but the regulation recognizes that diabetes and other conditions causing arterial calcification can produce misleadingly high ankle readings. In those cases the agency uses resting toe systolic pressures or toe-brachial ratios instead, so a normal ankle result should not be treated as the end of the inquiry.
Related Practice Areas
Diabetic neuropathy is evaluated in the same body system as the seizure and movement disorders covered on the firm’s neurological conditions page. Claimants whose diabetes has produced cardiac disease will find those criteria on the heart disease page. A claimant still working part time while managing the condition should read how earnings are counted on the working while on SSDI page.
A diabetes claim usually needs records from providers who have never spoken to one another. Neumann Law Group gathers them and charges nothing unless benefits are awarded. Call (800) 525-6386 or contact Neumann Law Group to start a free case evaluation.